| Ballot Title | Approval of 51i8r1 Boilerplate and Organic Coatings | ||||||
| Ballot Description | Should 51i8r1 Boilerplate and Organic Coatings be approved? | ||||||
| Ballot Options |
|
||||||
| Document for Approval | |||||||
| Opening Date | Thursday, 28 August 2008 @ 7:00 am ET | ||||||
| Closing Date | Thursday, 18 September 2008 @ 11:59 pm ET | ||||||
| Ballot has closed. | |||||||
| Referenced Items | |||
| Name | Type | Date | Action |
Reference Document | 2008-08-28 | No Access | |
Reference Document | 2008-08-28 | No Access | |
Reference Document | 2008-08-28 | No Access | |
| Voting Statistics | ||
| Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) | 25 | |
| Eligible members who have voted | 25 of 33 | 76% |
| Eligible members who have not voted | 8 of 33 | 24% |
| Voting Summary by Option | ||
| Options with highest number of votes are bold | ||
| Option | # Votes | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Affirmative | 21 | 84% |
| Negative w/Comment | 4 | 16% |
| Abstain | 0 | |
| Voting Summary by Interest Category | |||||
| Interest Category | Affirmative | Negative w/Comment | Abstain | Not Returned | Total |
| 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) | |
| General Interest | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Industry | 8 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 (33%) |
| Ingredient Supplier | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Medicine/Health | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Non-voting liaison | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Other | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Product Certifier / Testing Lab | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Public Health / Regulatory | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 11 (33%) |
| Trade Association | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| User | 5 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 11 (33%) |
| Water Utility | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Not Specified | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 (0%) |
| Total | 21 | 4 | 0 | 8 | 33 (100%) |
| Voting Details | |||||
| Voter Name |
Company | Category | Vote | Vote Time (GMT) | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carpigiani | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-09-01 05:56:00 | ||
| IMI Cornelius Inc. | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-09-02 13:54:00 | ||
| Wawa, Inc. | User | Affirmative | 2008-08-28 17:50:00 | ||
| Taylor Co. | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-08-28 18:02:00 | ||
| Navy and Marine Corps Public Health Center | User | Affirmative | 2008-09-10 10:57:00 | ||
| Norwegian Cruise Lines | User | -- | |||
| Lake County Health Dept. | Public Health / Regulatory | -- | |||
| Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. | User | Affirmative | 2008-09-19 02:30:00 | 1 New | |
| Manitoba Health | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-12 18:39:00 | ||
| Lincoln-Lancaster Co. Health Department | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-02 16:48:00 | ||
| Forsyth Co. Health Dept. | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-03 16:16:00 | 1 New | |
| Santa Clara County | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-10 15:53:00 | ||
| VA Dept. of Health | Public Health / Regulatory | -- | |||
| National Restaurant Assn. | User | -- | |||
| Glastender Inc | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-08-28 17:41:00 | ||
| City of Casper-Natrona Co. Health Dept. | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-18 14:42:00 | ||
| Hobart Corp. | Industry | Negative w/Comment | 2008-09-02 21:01:00 | 3 New | |
| ARI/CRMD | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-08-28 15:32:00 | ||
| NAFEM | Industry | Negative w/Comment | 2008-09-17 12:28:00 | 1 New | |
| NSF International | User | Affirmative | 2008-09-03 22:36:00 | ||
| The Delfield Co. | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-09-10 10:35:00 | ||
| U.S. Army | User | Negative w/Comment | 2008-09-10 12:45:00 | 1 New | |
| George Nakamura | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-03 15:55:00 | ||
| Unified Brands - Groen/Randell/Avtec/Capkold | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-09-05 21:05:00 | 1 New | |
| MN Department of Health | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-10 16:14:00 | ||
| Auto-Chlor System | Industry | Affirmative | 2008-09-11 14:43:00 | ||
| Ecolab, Inc. | Industry | -- | |||
| Baring Industries | User | Negative w/Comment | 2008-09-13 10:52:00 | 1 New | |
| Michigan State University | User | Affirmative | 2008-08-28 23:46:00 | ||
| Office of Food Safety / CFSAN | Public Health / Regulatory | -- | |||
| South Carolina Dept. of Health | Public Health / Regulatory | Affirmative | 2008-09-03 17:51:00 | ||
| McDonald's Corp | User | -- | |||
| George Zawacki Enterprises, LLC | User | -- | |||
| Voter Comments Collected During Ballot Voting | |||
| All Document Comments Voter Comments Only | |||
| Submitter | Subject | Comment, Proposal, and Response | Status (Resolution) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Perez, Michael Baring Industries | As proposed, the two notes following section 6.2.2.4 exempts organic coatings on food zone non-direct food contact surfaces from impact, abrasion and heat re... Delete paragraph 6.2.1.8. | New | |
| Gagliardi, Tony Forsyth Co. Health Dept. | I think that the note below 6.2.2.4 exempting coatings in a splash zone from complying should be eliminated | New | |
| Hipp, Joel Hobart Corp. | The addition of 6.2.1.8 and the first note, or exception, to 6.2.2.4 implies an organic coating used on corrosion resistant surfaces such as thermoplastic or... Combine the two notes after 6.2.2.4 into a new paragraph 6.2.2.5. Revise 6.2.1.8 to state that it applies to 6.2.2.1 through 6.2.2.4 only. | New | |
| Hipp, Joel Hobart Corp. | The proposed changes should include a rationale statement. Since these proposed changes are available for comment from the general public, there should be a... Add rationale statements that include reasons generated by the task group that proposed the change. | New | |
| Hipp, Joel Hobart Corp. | The terms "food zone direct food contact" and "food zone non-direct food contact" are not included in NSF/ANSI 170 definitions. The addition of these defini... Add the terms "food zone direct food contact" and "food zone non-direct food contact" to NSF/ANSI 170 definitions. Change "non-direct contact food zone" to ... | New | |
| Johnson, Tom NAFEM | The heating exemption is extended in this section as if cooling does not cause contraction of a possible metallic substrate which in turn could lead to break... Food and splash zone requirements should be the same, without exemptions in this case. | New | |
| McNeil, Thomas U.S. Army | This change appears to significantly weaken the requirements in the standard. I would like to see, as Joel Hipp commented what parts of the equipment would n... Carefully consider the overall effect of this change. Do you really want to add another zone. Direct food contact, food contact, splash zone and non food con... | New | |
| Coleman, Gary Underwriters Laboratories, Inc. | It is agreed that any change in requirements that potentially diminishe the degree of public health protection previously afforded is not warranted. These r... To move forward, it is important to determine if the purpose relates to one or two or to each of the following rationale for coating performance requirements... | New | |
| Negandhi, Dipak Unified Brands - Groen/Randell/Avtec/Capkold | I agree with Joel's comments regarding [1] adding a rationale statement and [2] revision of NSF 170, item 3.225 to add definition of "direct food contact sur... Same as above | New | |