Joint Committee on Pharmaceutical Excipients

Hello Pharmaceutical Excipients JC,   I owe you all a huge apology. I was just following up on some of my open issues and wondered why I did not get any responses on the definitions for this group. I then noticed that the summary for some reason was never sent out! Please review the attached summary and for those of you who were on the call let me know if you have any edits. For those of you who were not, we did not have a quorum but did have 3 motions. All those on the call were in favor but I will need to receive at least 3 more votes via email before I can move forward with the actions of the motions.   Motions: 1.        Ballot the definition for sanitary listed in the summary. 2.        Ballot the definition for data integrity listed in the summary. 3.        Ballot the definition for backup listed in the summary.   Thank you, Rachel   Rachel M. Brooker Standards Development Liaison, Health Sciences NSF International ISO/TC249 US TAG Administrator Email: rbrooker@xxxxxxx Phone: 734.827.6866   Attachment: 081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx Description: 081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx

I have reviewed and approve all three ballots listed and voted on in the attached document (081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx).   From: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brooker, Rachel Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 2:10 PM To: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jc_pharm_excip] Pharmaceutical Excipients JC   Hello Pharmaceutical Excipients JC,   I owe you all a huge apology. I was just following up on some of my open issues and wondered why I did not get any responses on the definitions for this group. I then noticed that the summary for some reason was never sent out! Please review the attached summary and for those of you who were on the call let me know if you have any edits. For those of you who were not, we did not have a quorum but did have 3 motions. All those on the call were in favor but I will need to receive at least 3 more votes via email before I can move forward with the actions of the motions.   Motions: 1.        Ballot the definition for sanitary listed in the summary. 2.        Ballot the definition for data integrity listed in the summary. 3.        Ballot the definition for backup listed in the summary.   Thank you, Rachel   Rachel M. Brooker Standards Development Liaison, Health Sciences NSF International ISO/TC249 US TAG Administrator Email: rbrooker@xxxxxxx Phone: 734.827.6866   Attachment: 081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx Description: 081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx

I also vote in favour of all three motions Regards Steve   From: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of katherine.l.ulman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 13 October 2016 17:57 To: rbrooker@xxxxxxx; jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jc_pharm_excip] RE: Pharmaceutical Excipients JC   EXTERNAL I have reviewed and approve all three ballots listed and voted on in the attached document (081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx).   From: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Brooker, Rachel Sent: Wednesday, October 12, 2016 2:10 PM To: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jc_pharm_excip] Pharmaceutical Excipients JC   Hello Pharmaceutical Excipients JC,   I owe you all a huge apology. I was just following up on some of my open issues and wondered why I did not get any responses on the definitions for this group. I then noticed that the summary for some reason was never sent out! Please review the attached summary and for those of you who were on the call let me know if you have any edits. For those of you who were not, we did not have a quorum but did have 3 motions. All those on the call were in favor but I will need to receive at least 3 more votes via email before I can move forward with the actions of the motions.   Motions: 1.        Ballot the definition for sanitary listed in the summary. 2.        Ballot the definition for data integrity listed in the summary. 3.        Ballot the definition for backup listed in the summary.   Thank you, Rachel   Rachel M. Brooker Standards Development Liaison, Health Sciences NSF International ISO/TC249 US TAG Administrator Email: rbrooker@xxxxxxx Phone: 734.827.6866   This e-mail was sent by GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited (registered in England and Wales No. 1047315), which is a member of the GlaxoSmithKline group of companies. The registered address of GlaxoSmithKline Services Unlimited is 980 Great West Road, Brentford, Middlesex TW8 9GS. GSK monitors email communications sent to and from GSK in order to protect GSK, our employees, customers, suppliers and business partners, from cyber threats and loss of GSK Information. GSK monitoring is conducted with appropriate confidentiality controls and in accordance with local laws and after appropriate consultation.

Hi I am in favour of these proposals   Best regards Iain Moore Head of Global Quality Assurance Croda International plc. Cowick Hall, Snaith United Kingdom DN14 9AA T   +44 (0)1405 863282 F   +44 (0)1405 861767 M +44 (0)7824 814690   From: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Brooker, Rachel Sent: 12 October 2016 19:10 To: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jc_pharm_excip] Pharmaceutical Excipients JC   Hello Pharmaceutical Excipients JC,   I owe you all a huge apology. I was just following up on some of my open issues and wondered why I did not get any responses on the definitions for this group. I then noticed that the summary for some reason was never sent out! Please review the attached summary and for those of you who were on the call let me know if you have any edits. For those of you who were not, we did not have a quorum but did have 3 motions. All those on the call were in favor but I will need to receive at least 3 more votes via email before I can move forward with the actions of the motions.   Motions: 1.        Ballot the definition for sanitary listed in the summary. 2.        Ballot the definition for data integrity listed in the summary. 3.        Ballot the definition for backup listed in the summary.   Thank you, Rachel   Rachel M. Brooker Standards Development Liaison, Health Sciences NSF International ISO/TC249 US TAG Administrator Email: rbrooker@xxxxxxx Phone: 734.827.6866   This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and may also be privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please email the sender immediately by replying to this message and delete the material from any computer. The message is attributed to the sender and may not necessarily reflect the view of Croda International Plc, its subsidiaries or associates. To unsubscribe please contact http://www.croda.com/unsubscribe.aspx Part of Croda International Plc, registered in England no: 206132 Registered Office: Cowick Hall, Snaith, Goole, East Yorkshire DN14 9AA www.croda.com Attachment: 081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx Description: 081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx

I too support these proposals.  Bob Sent from my iPhone On Oct 13, 2016, at 6:12 PM, Moore, Iain < Iain.Moore@xxxxxxxxx > wrote: Hi I am in favour of these proposals   Best regards Iain Moore Head of Global Quality Assurance Croda International plc. Cowick Hall, Snaith United Kingdom DN14 9AA T   +44 (0)1405 863282 F   +44 (0)1405 861767 M +44 (0)7824 814690   From: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [ mailto:jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ] On Behalf Of Brooker, Rachel Sent: 12 October 2016 19:10 To: jc_pharm_excip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [jc_pharm_excip] Pharmaceutical Excipients JC   Hello Pharmaceutical Excipients JC,   I owe you all a huge apology. I was just following up on some of my open issues and wondered why I did not get any responses on the definitions for this group. I then noticed that the summary for some reason was never sent out! Please review the attached summary and for those of you who were on the call let me know if you have any edits. For those of you who were not, we did not have a quorum but did have 3 motions. All those on the call were in favor but I will need to receive at least 3 more votes via email before I can move forward with the actions of the motions.   Motions: 1.        Ballot the definition for sanitary listed in the summary. 2.        Ballot the definition for data integrity listed in the summary. 3.        Ballot the definition for backup listed in the summary.   Thank you, Rachel   Rachel M. Brooker Standards Development Liaison, Health Sciences NSF International ISO/TC249 US TAG Administrator Email: rbrooker@xxxxxxx Phone: 734.827.6866   This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential and may also be privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, please email the sender immediately by replying to this message and delete the material from any computer. The message is attributed to the sender and may not necessarily reflect the view of Croda International Plc, its subsidiaries or associates. To unsubscribe please contact http://www.croda.com/unsubscribe.aspx Part of Croda International Plc, registered in England no: 206132 Registered Office: Cowick Hall, Snaith, Goole, East Yorkshire DN14 9AA www.croda.com <081916 Pharmaceutical Excipients JC Draft Summary.docx>