Public Workspaces

Title STRAW BALLOT for NSF 391.1 Scope Recommendations 04-03-2015
Description
Please vote on all five (5) ballots below, as motioned by the JC during the March 20th, 2015 face to face meeting. The meeting summary and scope consensus document can be found in the referenced documents below.  Please be sure to vote on all ballots. 

Ballot #1: Do you approve of the Professional Service Definition below?

NSF 391.1 shall adopt the following as a definition of professional services: For purposes of NSF 391.1,Professional Service Firms are identified as organizations generally characterized by high knowledge intensity, low capital intensity, and with a professionalized workforce. This definition will be supplemented by additional guidance, including a list of NAICS codes that represent providers of professional services. Additionally, the phrases appearing in bold will be added to the glossary as defined terms within the standard (final wording of the definitions subject to further revision).


Ballot #2: Do you approve of the recommendation that 391.1 apply at the professional service-line level?

NSF 391.1 will apply at the professional service-line level.  A professional service-line is defined as the materials, activities and portions of the company centered on delivering a professional service.  For companies that only offer professional services, the service line is essentially equivalent to the entire company.  For companies that offer a mix of professional and non-professional services NSF 391.1 will not certify the non-professional services-line; however, given the nature of the life cycle impacts associated with professional services, NSF 391.1 will include criteria applicable to the entire company, facilities and other boundaries that may impact the non-professional service-line.

Ballot #3: Do you approve of the recommendation to defer the below proposal and address at a later date?

The Joint Committee shall discuss the merits of allowing companies to offer both sustainable and non- sustainable professional service offerings after the criteria are substantially completed.


Ballot #4: Do you approve of the recommendation to structure the standard with prerequisites and point based criteria?

NSF 391.1 may include both prerequisite and point-based criteria within any category of the standard.  Prerequisite criteria are mandatory and must be achieved in order for a professional service provider to be certified to the standard. Individual point-based criteria are optional but include points that cumulatively allow a service provider to achieve certification and higher tiers of performance.


Ballot #5: Do you approve of the recommendation to include management and governance criteria in NSF 391.1?
Ballot Options Ballot has closed
[ ] Ballot #1: Affirmative
[ ] Ballot #1: Negative
[ ] Ballot #1: Abstention
[ ] Ballot #2: Affirmative
[ ] Ballot #2: Negative
[ ] Ballot #2: Abstention
[ ] Ballot #3: Affirmative
[ ] Ballot #3: Negative
[ ] Ballot #3: Abstention
[ ] Ballot #4: Affirmative
[ ] Ballot #4: Negative
[ ] Ballot #4: Abstention
[ ] Ballot #5 Affirmative
[ ] Ballot #5: Negative
[ ] Ballot #5: Abstention
Opening Date Fri, Apr 3 2015 5:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time
Closing Date Fri, Apr 17 2015 11:59 pm Eastern Daylight Time
Ballot has closed.
Up to 5 options may be chosen.

Referenced Items

Name Type Date Actions

03277: STRAW BALLOT for NSF 391.1 Scope Recommendations 04-03-2015

Document (Archive)

2015-04-18

No Access

JC on Sustainable Service Providers mtg summary 3-20-2015.pdf

Document

2015-03-28

No Access

Scope Consensus Document - Brennan Conaway.pdf

Document

2015-04-02


- Voting Results

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 12
Eligible members who have voted 12 of 18 66.667%
Eligible members who have not voted 6 of 18 33.333%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Ballot #1: Affirmative 12 20%
Ballot #1: Negative w/comment 0 0%
Ballot #1: Abstention 0 0%
Ballot #2: Affirmative 11 18.333%
Ballot #2: Negative w/comment 1 1.667%
Ballot #2: Abstention 0 0%
Ballot #3: Affirmative 11 18.333%
Ballot #3: Negative w/comment 0 0%
Ballot #3: Abstention 1 1.667%
Ballot #4: Affirmative 12 20%
Ballot #4: Negative w/comment 0 0%
Ballot #4: Abstention 0 0%
Ballot #5 Affirmative 11 18.333%
Ballot #5: Negative w/comment 0 0%
Ballot #5: Abstention 1 1.667%

Voting Summary by Interest Category

Interest CategoryBallot #1: AffirmativeBallot #1: Negative w/commentBallot #1: AbstentionBallot #2: AffirmativeBallot #2: Negative w/commentBallot #2: AbstentionBallot #3: AffirmativeBallot #3: Negative w/commentBallot #3: AbstentionBallot #4: AffirmativeBallot #4: Negative w/commentBallot #4: AbstentionBallot #5 AffirmativeBallot #5: Negative w/commentBallot #5: AbstentionNot Returned
Academia / NGO0000000000000000
Distributor0000000000000000
Emeritus0000000000000000
Fabricator/Formulator0000000000000000
General Interest0000000000000000
Government0000000000000000
Industry6006006006006003
Ingredient Supplier0000000000000000
Manufacturer0000000000000000
Manufacturer Processes0000000000000000
Medicine/Health0000000000000000
Non-voting Liaison0000000000000000
Other0000000000000000
Other Industry0000000000000000
Practitioner/Service Provider0000000000000000
Product Certifier / Testing Lab0000000000000000
Public Health / Regulatory3002102013002011
Purchasers & Ecolabel Criteria Users0000000000000000
Sustainability Advocate & Gov0000000000000000
Trade Association0000000000000000
User3003003003003002
Water Utility0000000000000000
Not Specified0000000000000000
Total120011101101120011016