Public Workspaces

Title Two-Tiered Standard
Description
While we have a debate meeting coming up Ralph wanted to open this ballot now. It will not close until a week after the debate meeting so you will have time to change your mind if you would like. You can come in and change your vote any time before the ballot closes. Opening it now will give us a sense of where people are leaning before the debate meeting. 

The two features that would be in the 2-tiered standard are external displays and alarms. This means that the base level will not require an external display or alarm but the "upper" level (name TBD) will require both an external display and alarm. 

This ballot will be held to the official consensus ruling to pass which is that at least 50% of the members must vote affirmative if that requirement is met then all of the affirmative and negative votes will be added together and at least 2/3rd of those total votes must be affirmative. In this case, "affirmative" is that you support a 2-tiered standard. 

This ballot is for voting members only.
Ballot Options Ballot has closed
[ ] Affirmative (aka I support having a two-tiered standard)
[ ] Negative (aka I do NOT support having a two-tiered standard)
[ ] Abstain
Opening Date Mon, Apr 1 2019 1:00 pm Eastern Daylight Time
Closing Date Mon, Apr 22 2019 11:59 pm Eastern Daylight Time
Ballot has closed.

Referenced Items

Name Type Date Actions

05769: Two-Tiered Standard

Document (Archive)

2019-04-23

No Access

- Voting Results

Voting Statistics

Number of votes cast (excluding abstentions) 13
Eligible members who have voted 13 of 19 68.421%
Eligible members who have not voted 6 of 19 31.579%

Voting Summary by Option

Options with highest number of votes are bold
Option # Votes % of Total
Affirmative (aka I support having a two-tiered standard) 0 0%
Negative (aka I do NOT support having a two-tiered standard) 13 100%
Abstain w/comment 0

Voting Summary by Interest Category

Interest CategoryAffirmative (aka I support having a two-tiered standard)Negative (aka I do NOT support having a two-tiered standard)Abstain w/commentNot ReturnedTotal
Academia / NGO00000 (0%)
Distributor00000 (0%)
Emeritus00000 (0%)
Fabricator/Formulator00000 (0%)
General Interest00000 (0%)
Government00000 (0%)
Industry04026 (31.579%)
Ingredient Supplier00000 (0%)
Manufacturer00000 (0%)
Manufacturer Processes00000 (0%)
Medicine/Health00000 (0%)
Non-voting Liaison00000 (0%)
Other00000 (0%)
Other Industry00000 (0%)
Practitioner/Service Provider00000 (0%)
Product Certifier / Testing Lab00000 (0%)
Public Health / Regulatory07018 (42.105%)
Purchasers & Ecolabel Criteria Users00000 (0%)
Sustainability Advocate & Gov00000 (0%)
Trade Association00000 (0%)
User02035 (26.316%)
Water Utility00000 (0%)
Not Specified00000 (0%)
Total0130619 (100%)