Public Workspaces

Comment 12178
New (Unresolved)
DRAFT_GEC_ESG Criteria Document_1Dec2023_Redline Changes for Public Comment_v2.pdf (Revision 1)
Comment Submitted by
Kazuhito Oosumi
2024-01-15 00:45:23

We have a concern on the following sentences.

 

“The assessment of persistent nonconformances from the past year shall be based on consultation with a local, national, regional and/or international industry–independent organization(s) to monitored sites (e.g., community groups, worker organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and/or labor experts). The assessment shall include a description of who was consulted, what issues were raised, and how this influenced the corrective action plan.”

 

Besides the audit, the above requirements impose “consultation with community groups, worker organization and/or labor experts etc.”, to suppliers.

We think that it will be excessive requirements to suppliers, especially small and medium size suppliers. We think that at this time, the requirements should not impose to suppliers.

 

Submitter Proposed Solution

Since it will be excessive requirements to suppliers, especially small and medium size suppliers, we think that at this time, the following requirements should not impose to suppliers.

Therefore, the following sentences should be deleted.

 

[DELETE: The assessment of persistent nonconformances from the past year shall be based on consultation with a local, national, regional and/or international industry–independent organization(s) to monitored sites (e.g., community groups, worker organizations, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and/or labor experts). The assessment shall include a description of who was consulted, what issues were raised, and how this influenced the corrective action plan.]