Public Workspaces

Home
Documents
Ballots

Previous Comment in Document Next Comment in Document Document Details

Comment 12206 New (Unresolved)	DRAFT_GEC_ESG Criteria Document_1Dec2023_Redline Changes for Public Comment_v2.pdf (Revision 1)

Comment 12206

New (Unresolved)

DRAFT_GEC_ESG Criteria Document_1Dec2023_Redline Changes for Public Comment_v2.pdf (Revision 1)

Comment Submitted by Cara Beatty 2024-01-15 15:58:56	The methodology used for determining “significant” shall consider the percentage of registered product the facility produces - is there any threshold for this?

Comment Submitted by
Cara Beatty
2024-01-15 15:58:56

The methodology used for determining “significant” shall consider the percentage of registered product the facility produces - is there any threshold for this?

Submitter Proposed Solution	Provide verification evidence (specific examples) to illustrate how significant facilities are identified.

Submitter Proposed Solution

Provide verification evidence (specific examples) to illustrate how significant facilities are identified.

File Name	DRAFT_GEC_ESG Criteria Document_1Dec2023_Redline Changes for Public Comment_v2.pdf	State	Draft
Date Added	2023-11-29 5:53 pm Eastern Standard Time	Revision Number	1
Submitter Name	Cassandra Leone	Size	776K

Summary	7.1.7 - Significant facilities	State (Disposition)	New (Unresolved)
Date Added	2024-01-15 15:58:56	Last Updated	2024-01-15 15:58:57
Submitter Name	Cara Beatty	Assigned To	Unassigned
Company Name	Global Electronics Council	Response	None
Interest Category		Category	N/A
Origin	Public Review	Section, Page, Line	Section 7.1.7, Page 26, Line 18
Item	N/A	Item Description

Public Workspaces

Document Information

Comment Information

Contact Us

Membership