Public Workspaces

Comment 133
Addressed (Unresolved)
173i29.pdf (Revision 0)
Approval of 173i29r1
Comment Submitted by
Leila Saldanha
2008-02-14 14:25:41
I agree with Darryl and Heather regarding specifying only USP. The sections should specify USP, AOAC, or other appropriate compendial test methods --- consistent with the new CGMPs.
Submitter Proposed Solution
Developer Response
Good Morning Ms. Saldanha, Thank you for your comments on the Joint Committee ballot of Standard 173 (173i29) regarding the quality assurance for quantitative test methods. Attached are your comments on this issue and the response of the issue proponent, Kerri LeVanseler of NSF International. I hope the above addresses your concerns. Thank you for your comments. If you have additional comments, or wish to discuss these points further, please contact Ms. LeVanseler.
Supporting File: Levanseler-Saldanha-response 10-14-2008.pdf