Public Workspaces

Comment 152
Addressed (Unresolved)
173i29.pdf (Revision 0)
Approval of 173i29r1
Comment Submitted by
Jim Roza
2008-02-21 17:34:06
I concur with my other colleagues who registered a negative vote that methods other than USP i.e. AOAC or AOCS should be allowed.
Submitter Proposed Solution
Developer Response
Good morning Mr. Roza, Thank you for your comments on the Joint Committee ballot of Standard 173 (173i29) regarding the quality assurance for quantitative test methods. Attached are your comments on this issue and the response of the issue proponent, Kerri LeVanseler of NSF International. I hope the attached document addresses your concerns. Thank you for your comments. If you have additional comments, or wish to discuss these points further, please contact Ms. Levanseler.
Supporting File: Levanseler-Roza-response 10-14-2008.pdf