Ms. Margaret Bicking added comment "Should only be in 53" to the document "42i128r2 et al - Manganese - JC Memo & Ballot.pdf" in the "Joint Committee on Drinking Water Treatment Units" group.
Subject: Should only be in 53
Category: N/A
Comment
It would probably be too confusing or misleading for most consumers to have it have it in both 53 and 42. It should only be in 53.
Copper and fluoride are on both the primary and secondary EPA contaminant lists . Both copper and fluoride contaminant claims only appear in 53, and 58.
This would be consistent with how we claim health contaminants that also have an aesthetic claim.
Proposal
Only have the claim in Standard 53
Comment Number: #12288
Submitter: Ms. Margaret Bicking
Date submitted: 2024-01-29 21:11:53
Status: new
View Comment Details
View Document Details
Download Document
|
---------------------------------
Margaret Bicking Compliance Engineer
Compliance Engineer
Ecowater Systems
651-731-7409 Compliance Engineer
bickingm@ecowater.com---------------------------------