The verification requirement of this criterion draft is at the “product category level”, not at the “corporation level”.
In case that manufacturer has a wide range product portfolio not covered under EPEAT product categories, we propose that it will be acceptable for such manufacturer to disclose its annual public corporate data for the 3TG as a “corporation level” rather than its “product category level” limited to the EPEAT registered product category.
We would like to clarify that the “corporation level” also should be acceptable, because the “corporation level” covers the EPEAT product category under the corporation level disclosure data. In other words, we would suggest that this criterion can be verified at “corporation level” as well as “product category level”.
|
